Global warming is the greatest environmental challenge of our time. Sea levels are on the rise, ice and snow cover are decreasing, and storms are becoming more powerful. Leading scientists, such as James Hansen of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, caution that we are nearing a climate “tipping point,” beyond which large-scale, dangerous impacts would become unavoidable.[i] The Safe Climate Act (H.R. 5642) aims to keep emissions of the pollutants that cause global warming below this threshold and protect future generations from catastrophic changes to the climate.
Bill Framework
In 1992, the U.S. and most nations of the world agreed to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which has the objective of stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent “dangerous anthropogenic interference” with the climate system.[ii] Scientists and policymakers recognize a 2°C (3.6°F) increase in global temperature over the pre-industrial average as a limit beyond which such changes would become unavoidable.[iii]
Even below 2°C, significant impacts from global warming are likely, such as damage to many ecosystems, decreases in crop yields, sea level rise, and the widespread loss of coral reefs.[iv] Beyond 2°C, however, the risks are grave, such as the disintegration of the Greenland ice sheet, which would trigger an eventual 23-feet rise in sea level and displace millions of people worldwide.[v]
The Safe Climate Act is designed to keep temperatures below this threshold and prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system by freezing U.S. emissions in 2010 and gradually reducing them each year through 2050.
Emission Reduction Targets
The Safe
Climate Act freezes U.S.
emissions at 2009 levels in 2010 and then gradually reduces them by roughly 2%
per year through 2020. This gives us 15
years to deploy the cleaner technologies that we already have but are not using
much, such as hybrid vehicles and wind power. After 2020, the bill cuts
emissions by roughly 5% per year, as more advanced technologies, such as
zero-energy buildings and biofuels from waste materials, become widely
available. Taken together, emissions
will reach 1990 levels by 2020, and 80% of 1990 levels by 2050, which mirror
the goals established by California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Achieving the Emission Reductions
To help achieve the emission reductions, the bill calls for a greater reliance on clean, renewable energy sources, improved energy efficiency, and clean cars. It also provides companies flexibility in meeting the pollution-reduction goals through a “cap-and-trade” program. Specifically:
- Renewable
energy standard:
The bill directs the Department of Energy (DOE) to establish national
standards requiring 20% of electricity to be generated from renewable
energy sources in 2020.
- Energy
efficiency standard: The bill directs the DOE to establish national standards
requiring utilities to obtain 10% of their energy supplies through energy
efficiency in 2020.
- Clean cars standard: The bill directs the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to set standards for reducing global
warming emissions from motor vehicles that are at least as stringent as
the current California
standards. EPA must tighten these standards in 2014 and periodically
thereafter.
- Cap-and-trade program: The bill directs EPA to set
a cap on global warming emissions from the largest polluters and allow the
polluters to meet the cap by buying and selling emissions allowances. Specifically:
• Allowances are distributed according to a plan developed by the President, with an opportunity for Congress to ratify or modify the plan.
• Proceeds from auctioning allowances are deposited in the “Climate Reinvestment Fund.”
• Revenues in the fund are dedicated to maximizing the public benefit and promoting economic growth, including supporting technology research and development, compensating consumers for any energy cost increases, providing transition assistance for affected workers and regions, and protecting against harm from climate change, such as safeguarding water supplies, protecting against hurricanes, and mitigating harm to fish and wildlife habitat.
Periodic Scientific Review
The bill directs
the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) to review, every five years, our
progress in avoiding dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate
system. If the NAS finds that dangerous global warming is likely, it must
identify the reductions needed and recommend additional national and
international actions to achieve the reductions.
[i] James E. Hansen, NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies and Columbia University Earth Institute, Is There Still Time to Avoid “Dangerous Anthropogenic Interference” with Global Climate, presentation to the American Geophysical Union, 6 December 2005, opening remarks.
[ii] United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, available at http://www.globelaw.com/Climate/fcc.htm. For U.S. ratification date, see http://www.globalpolicy.org/empire/tables/treaties.htm.
[iii] Malte Meinshausen, “What Does a 2?C Target Mean for Greenhouse Gas Concentrations? A Brief Analysis Based on Multi-Gas Emission Pathways and Several Climate Sensitivity Uncertainty Estimates,” in Hans Joachim Schnellnhuber, ed., Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, 2006.
[iv] Rachel Warren, “Impacts of Global Climate Change at Different Annual Mean Global Temperature Increases,” in Hans Joachim Schnellnhuber, ed., Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, 2006.
[v] Jason A. Lowe et al, “The Role of Sea-Level Rise and the Greenland Ice Sheet in Dangerous Climate Change: Implications for the Stabilisation of the Climate,” in Hans Joachim Schellnhuber et al. (eds.), Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 29-36; James Hansen, “A Slippery Slope: How Much Global Warming Constitutes ‘Dangerous Anthropogenic Interference?’” Climatic Change, 68:269-279, 2005.
