logo

Global Warming Campaign News

SearchRSS Feed

For Immediate Release:
07/17/2008
For More Information:
Contact Adam Rivera
(850) 224-5944

Report Makes Case For Best Alternatives to Oil

TALLAHASSEE – Many alternative fuels designed to wean America   The report comes as gas stations across the state are preparing to comply with a requirement in the energy bill signed by Governor Crist last month that requires all gas sold in Florida to contain at least 10% ethanol by 2010. off of oil will cause a whole host of other problems and increase global warming emissions, according to a report released today by Environment Florida.

The report, “Beyond Oil: The Transportation Fuels That Can Help Reduce Global Warming”, evaluates the leading contenders in the alternative fuels race, with a specific focus on their impact on global warming and the environment. The worst examples cited by the report include liquid coal, corn ethanol and soy biodiesel, all of which have 50% - 100% greater emissions relative to conventional gasoline.   The report shows that the best solution to lowering emissions from vehicles is to combine the approaches that offer the greatest environmental benefits. For example, an efficient plug-in hybrid vehicle operating on electricity and cellulosic ethanol made from crop waste has emissions that are at least 70% lower than gasoline.

“Today’s headlines are telling us that we must move away from oil as a transportation fuel,” said Holly Binns, Field Director with Environment Florida.  “We cannot afford to make other problems worse in our quest to reduce our dependence on oil,” she added.   

Key findings include:

Biodiesel - Biodiesel from soybeans, the most common feedstock for biodiesel, is at least 50 percent more polluting than conventional diesel and, like corn ethanol, can cause many other problems associated with high intensity agriculture.  However, the report also found that if the diesel is made from waste cooking oil, life-cycle global warming pollution emissions from biodiesel can be as much as 98 percent less than conventional diesel. 

Cellulosic Ethanol - Producing cellulosic ethanol from certain feedstocks can reduce global warming pollution. Cellulosic ethanol made from crop waste, prairie grass grown on abandoned or marginal cropland can have emissions well below that of gasoline.

Corn Ethanol - High-volume corn ethanol production does not result in lower global warming emissions than gasoline. In fact, full life-cycle emissions from corn ethanol may be twice as high as gasoline, when secondary land-use impacts are taken into account.  The increased production of corn ethanol has also caused a host of other problems including water pollution and competition for cropland used for food.  

Hydrogen – This has long been touted as the transportation fuel of the future. But the environmental impacts of hydrogen depend greatly on how it is produced, and hydrogen-powered vehicles are still a long way from being available to American consumers.

Liquid Coal Fuel - Liquid produced from coal creates at least 80 percent more global warming pollution than gasoline. The fuel starts with a high-carbon energy source and requires heavy processing.

 

Natural gas - reduces air pollution and global warming pollution compared with gasoline vehicles. But natural gas fueling infrastructure is expensive and domestic supplies of natural gas are both finite and increasingly constrained.

Plug-in hybrids and all-electric vehicles -  Because electric motors are far more efficient than internal combustion engines, vehicles that use electricity almost always produce less global warming pollution than gasoline vehicles, even when the electricity used to fuel them is generated from coal.  Plug in hybrids powered by the average U.S. electricity mix are 50% less polluting than gasoline.  The benefits are far greater when vehicles are fueled with renewably-generated electricity.

“As the race for alternative fuels accelerates, we must encourage the development of new options that reduce global warming and avoid severe environmental impacts,” concluded Binns. “We need to put the brakes on the rush to corn ethanol and environmentally harmful liquid coal technologies and move toward 21st century technologies like plug-in hybrids and other fuels that do not create more problems than they solve,” she added.  

The report makes a number of recommendations to local state and federal policymakers for achieving large reductions in global warming pollution from cars and light trucks and reducing our oil dependence; including: 

  • Adopting requirements to lower the carbon content of transportation fuels; including amending the recently passed federal renewable fuels standard to require that all ethanol sold is subject to a low carbon fuel standard.
  • Rejecting policies that promote or subsidize fuels that would make the problem worse.
  • Requiring that by 2020, all new vehicles are capable of using lower carbon fuels, whether electricity or bio-fuels.
  • Supporting additional research into cultivation techniques for cellulosic feedstock and into technologies for converting cellulosic feed-stocks, especially waste, into fuel.
  • Improving vehicle fuel economy and pursuing measures to reduce total driving. These measures would further cut global warming emissions and reduce our vulnerability to rapid changes in the global petroleum market.

“By committing to an approach that combines the best technologies, the cleanest fuels, and that sets rigorous environmental standards for alternative fuels, Florida can improve its energy security, while cutting global warming pollution and protecting our environment,” said Binns.  “One thing is clear: Florida has little time to lose in addressing these challenges.  And we cannot afford false starts.”

###